What makes architecture great? Is it in the art pieces, visually appealing forms or the experiences and quality of the spaces thus created that may not strike one at first glance? Is it a balance of both, if there is any? Are designers concentrating too much on the face value of Architecture and abandoning its very core?
As a student of Architecture, am always amazed by the greatness of Architecture from the East. Japanese Architecture for example stands out not just because of its picturesque nature but the experience one gets from its spaces. Parallels of these works can be drawn from the works of one of my favorite Architects and proponent of organic Architecture Frank L. Wright. His designs borrow heavily from Japanese architecture which he studied in depth. His landscapes, fenestrations, proportions of rooms and more revolve around the user of the space and not the other way. The user is not forced to accommodate the design but rather the design accommodates him. They are mostly simple, true to their purpose non-showy designs with great human experience.
This type of Architecture is usually understated, apart from Wright’s of course, and instead we celebrate Architects that have established supposedly art pieces mostly deconstructive and at times absolute crazy designs that often have no respect to humans.
Asked if he practices showy architecture, Frank Ghery recently responded by claiming that 98% of everything built and designed today is pure shit. They have no sense of design, no respect for humanity or anything else and are just damn buildings. Personally being not very keen on the works of Ghery couldn’t agree more. And of course wouldn’t understand an 85 years old Architect responding with a middle finger to a reporter’s question. But then again its Frank Ghery, he is dedicated to his work, has no publicist, waits for no call from anyone and works with clients who respect the Art of Architecture.
The important question here is what makes architecture great. It’s one question that I may never find an answer in my lifetime and if I happen to, then it would be a subjective one. Is it in the art pieces, visually appealing forms or the experiences and quality of the spaces thus created that may not strike one at first glance? Is it a balance of both, if there is any? How many Architects today aim at creating humane spaces that are still showy? Are designers concentrating too much on the face value of Architecture and abandoning its very core?
The 21st century concept of starchitecture is one that is not going away anytime soon. We live in a world where at some point there is bound to be celebrities in all aspects of life; celebrity footballers, celebrity chefs, celebrity musicians and the lot. ...
If you want your own avatar and keep track of your discussions with the community, sign up to archiDATUM >>
Vodafone Site Solution Innovation Centre (SSIC) is the first 6 Star Green Star SA accredited building in South Africa, the equivalent of ...
The London based architecture studio Weston Williamson + Partners have triumphed in an international design competition to create a Scien...
This week we look at the souls behind a unique kind of expression within African art, a look into the five artists within the continent w...
Located on 10ha of a 213ha site in the Ouaga 2000 district, the International conference center project, complemented by an immense urban...
Lexicon + Ion architects have just released plans for a proposed catholic cathedral in Congo modelled on the concept of Mary mother of Je...
The new Embassy of the Netherlands is a building that thrives within its environment, seeking new ways to deal with both the thermal neme...